Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Youth & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DWORKIN, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by SCHREIBER, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Parenting or Placing

Decision Making by Pregnant Teens

ROSALIND J. DWORKIN

Institute for Child and Family Services, Houston, Texas

JANE T. HARDING

Institute for Child and Family Services, Houston, Texas

NELDA B. SCHREIBER

Institute for Child and Family Services, Houston, Texas

This research studies decision making for resolution of an unplanned pregnancy as a dynamic process and examines predictors of both the initial plan and the consistency of the adoption plan. Among 162 pregnant adolescents in a maternity residence, 57% entered the program planning adoption for their baby. Nearly half of them changed that plan by discharge and decided to parent. Social influence variables were predictive for both the original plan and consistency. Mother's preference was the strongest predictor of initial plan, and birthfather's preference was the strongest for consistency. Sociodemographic and social psychology variables were not predictive.

Youth & Society, Vol. 25, No. 1, 75-92 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0044118X93025001005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
M. O. Wiley and A. L. Baden
Birth Parents in Adoption: Research, Practice, and Counseling Psychology
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 2005; 33(1): 13 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
K. P. Zamostny, K. M. O'Brien, A. L. Baden, and M. O. Wiley
The Practice of Adoption: History, Trends, and Social Context
The Counseling Psychologist, November 1, 2003; 31(6): 651 - 678.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Gender SocietyHome page
C. E. EDWARDS and C. L. WILLIAMS
ADOPTING CHANGE: Birth Mothers in Maternity Homes Today
Gender Society, February 1, 2000; 14(1): 160 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]