Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Youth & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WALDNER-HAUGRUD, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by MAGRUDER, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Homosexual Identity Expression among Lesbian and Gay Adolescents

An Analysis of Perceived Structural Associations

LISA K. WALDNER-HAUGRUD

University of Houston-Downtown

BRIAN MAGRUDER

Iowa State University

Theoretical and empirical analysis of homosexual identity neglects the influence of structural factors on identity expression. The Negotiated Identity Model proposes that perceptions of external forces influence adolescents through supportive resources and obstacles that may inhibit identity expression. Snowball sampling provided 172 self-identified homosexual adolescents, including 85 lesbians and 87 gay males. Perceptions of structural associations tested included religiosity, importance of school, political ideology of parents, socioeconomic status (SES) of parents, importance of heterosexual friends, frequency of heterosexual sexual encounters, importance of heterosexual sexual encounters, and gender nonconformity. Multiple regression analysis explained more of the variance for gay men than for lesbians. Variables important for gay males included political ideology, SES, heterosexual friends, and gender nonconformity. Significant variables for lesbians included religion and importance of school. Gender differences are discussed as well as implications for adolescents.

Youth & Society, Vol. 27, No. 3, 313-333 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0044118X96027003003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
A. K. T. Tsang, H. Irving, R. Alaggia, S. B. Y. Chau, and M. Benjamin
Negotiating Ethnic Identity In Canada: The Case of the "Satellite Children"
Youth Society, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 359 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
R. F. OSWALD
Who am I in Relation to Them?: Gay, Lesbian, and Queer People Leave the City to Attend Rural Family Weddings
Journal of Family Issues, April 1, 2002; 23(3): 323 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
J. S. Peterson
Gifted and Gay: A Study of the Adolescent Experience
Gifted Child Quarterly, October 1, 2000; 44(4): 231 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]