Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Youth & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHENK, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by ZEHR, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Restorative Justice and Substance Abuse

The Path Ahead

BARB TOEWS SHENK

Pennsylvania Prison Society

HOWARD ZEHR

Eastern Mennonite University

In bringing together restorative justice and adolescent treatment, a dialogue has been created between two fields that have developed quite separately. This dialogue is just beginning, and there remain many paths to follow up, many fault lines to explore. Following a clarification about the basic concept of restorative justice, this article explores paths that might benefit from further exploration such as concepts of harms, causes, and obligations; offenders as victims; shame and vindication; and the fundamental and guiding questions of restorative justice. Possible fault lines and dangers, such as co-optation and victim exclusion, are explored. The article concludes with suggestions for ways to stay true to the restorative justice vision through attention to values and evaluation, revisioning the role of the "expert" and the language of respect.

Youth & Society, Vol. 33, No. 2, 314-328 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0044118X01033002009
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Youth SocietyHome page
E. A. BLECHMAN, M. G. HILE, and D. B. FISHMAN
Restorative Justice and the Prosocial Communities Solution
Youth Society, December 1, 2001; 33(2): 273 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Youth SocietyHome page
M. K. KRAFT, R. MUCK, and G. BAZEMORE
Common Ground: Opportunities and Possibilities
Youth Society, December 1, 2001; 33(2): 329 - 335.
[PDF]