|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Youth & Society, Vol. 38, No. 2,
155-176 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0044118X05282765
Building Social Capital in Vulnerable Families
Success Markers of a School-Based Intervention Program
Jenepher Lennox Terrion
University of Ottawa
Researchers suggest that key to addressing the needs of vulnerable families is to involve parents in their child's academic life. However, this article argues, it is not simply involvement that matters for the improved functioning of these families but the production of the three dimensions of social capital (bonding, bridging, and linking) through human interaction in the school that reduces risk factors in vulnerable families. Thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with participants and community stakeholders in a school-based family support program, Families and Schools Together (F&ST), revealed six success markers implicit in the narratives. The success markers demonstrate that the major outcome of F&ST is the production of social capital in all three of its dimensions. The article highlights the importance of social capital in building stronger, more resilient families.
Key Words: family support • social capital • child and youth development • at-risk families • vulnerable families • school failure
References
- Barnard, W. M. (2004). Parent involvement in elementary school and educational attainment. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 39-62.
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the theory of sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
- Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 98-124.[Abstract]
- Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl. 95), S94-S120.
- Comer, J. (1988). Educating poor minority children. Scientific American, 259(5), 42-42.
- Devaney, E. S., & Milstein, J. P. (1998). Kids + family + school = success: A kindergarten student and family support program. Social Work in Education, 20(2), 131-138.
- Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Family Service Canada. (2002). Canadian National Evaluation of Outcomes: 1996-2002.
- Ottawa, Canada: Author. Favorino, A., & Pryor, C. (1994). Family-school alliances: A centerpiece strategy for alcohol and drug prevention programs. Social Work in Education, 16, 155-170.
- Fischer, R. L. (2003). School-based family support: Evidence from an exploratory field study. Families in Society, 84(3), 339-347.
- Frey, L. R., Botan, C., & Kreps, G. (2000). Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Heleen, O. (1992). Is your school family friendly? Principal, 72, 5-8.
- Hendry, L. B., & Reid, M. (2000). Social relationships and health: The meaning of social "connectedness" and how it relates to health concerns for rural Scottish adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 23(6), 705-719.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hill, R. (1958). Social stresses on the family: Generic features of families under stress. Social Casework, 39, 139-158.
- Jack, G., & Jordan, B. (1999). Social capital and child welfare. Children and Society, 13, 242-256.[CrossRef]
- Jones, C., Clark, L., Grusec, J., Hart, R., Plickert G., & Tepperman, L. (2002). Poverty, social capital, parenting and child outcomes in Canada. Ottawa: Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy, Human Resources Development Canada.
- Kibel, B. (1999). Success stories as hard data. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
- Layzer, J. I., Goodson, B., Creps, C., Werner, A., & Bernstein, L. (2001). National evaluation of family support programs: Volume B. Research studies (Final report). Cambridge, MA: ABT Associates.
- Maeroff, G. I. (1998). Altered destinies: Making life better for schoolchildren in need. New York: St. Martin's.
- Margolin, G., & Gordis, E. B. (2003). Co-occurrence between marital aggression and parents' child abuse potential: The impact of cumulative stress. Violence and Victims, 18(3), 243-258.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- McCubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1983). The family stress process: The double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation. In H. I. McCubbin, M. B. Sussman, & J. M. Patterson (Eds.), Social stress and the family: Advances and development in family stress theory and research. New York: Haworth.
- McDonald, L., Billingham, S., Conrad, T., Morgan, A., Nina, O., & Payton, E. (1997). Families and Schools Together (FAST): Integrating community development with clinical strategies. Families in Society, 78, 140-155.
- McDonald, L., & Sayger, T. (1998). Impact of a family- and school-based prevention program on protective factors for high risk youth: Issues in evaluation. Drugs and Society, 12, 61-86.
- Moberg, D. P., McDonald, L., Brown, R., & Burke, M. (2003, June). Randomized trial of Families and Schools Together (FAST). Paper presented at the Society for Prevention Research 11th annual meeting, Washington, DC.
- Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Putnam, R. D. (2001). Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Isuma, 2(1), 41-51.
- Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., Bauman, K. E., Harris, K. M., Jones, J., et al. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(10), 823–832.[Abstract]
- Resnick, M. D., Harris, L. J., & Blum, R. W. (1993). The impact of caring and connectedness on adolescent health and well-being. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 29(Suppl. 1), S3-S9.
- Runyan, D. K., Hunter, W. M., Amaya-Jackson, R. R., English, D., Landsverk, J., Dubowitz, H., et al. (1998). Children who prosper in unfavorable environments: The relationship to social capital. Pediatrics, 101(1), 12-19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Stanton-Salazar, R. D., Vàsquez, O. A., & Mehan, H. (2000). Engineering academic success through institutional support. In S. Gregory (Ed.), The academic achievement of minority students: Perspectives, practices, and prescriptions (pp. 213-247). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
- Task Force on the Family. (2003). Family pediatrics: Report of the Task Force on the Family. Pediatrics, 111(6), 1541-1571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Teachman, J. D., Paasch, K., & Carver, K. (1996). Social capital and dropping out of school early. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(3), 773-783.[CrossRef]
- Terrion, J. L., & Ashforth, B. (2002). From "I" to "we": The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group. Human Relations, 55(1), 55-88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Thayer, C. E., Fox, M., & Koszewski, W. (2002). Helping families transition from welfare to work. Journal of Extension. Retrieved August 14, 2004, from http://www.joe.org/joe/2002june/iw2.html
- Willms, J. D. (2001). Three hypotheses about community effects on social outcomes. Isuma, 2(1), 53-62.
- Willms, J. D. (2002). A study of vulnerable children. In J. D. Willms (Ed.), Vulnerable children (pp. 3-22). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta Press.
- Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Isuma, 2(1), 11-17.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
